• Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Search
Close
Home Resolve by DE

Full Stop No. 17/2019 (Pre-Litigation Property-Dispute)

Adv. Dilip Kumar by Adv. Dilip Kumar
August 13, 2020
in Resolve by DE
0
Full Stop No. 17/2019 (Pre-Litigation Property-Dispute)
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp

 

Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust
A Public Charitable Trust
Muzaffarpur

Full Stop No. 17 of 2019
(Pre-Litigation Property-Dispute)

Court’s Case Details: –
Name of the 01st Party: – Shri Anil Kumar Sharma S/o- Late Shivji Sharma A Resident at – Chapra Megh, Po- Chapra Megh, Ps- Mushahari, District – Muzaffarpur, Bihar
Name of the 02nd Party: – Smt. Anita Devi W/o Shri Bipin Mahto A Resident at – Chapra Megh, Po- Chapra Megh, Ps- Mushahari District – Muzaffarpur, Bihar

Full-Stop

06.10.2019: – It is a Pre-litigative property dispute. The root cause of the dispute is a piece of land bearing R.S Khata No. 957, RSP No. 2134 measuring an area of 06½ decimals, situated at Village & Po- Chapra Megh, Anchal- Mushahari, district- Muzaffarpur. The facts of the dispute are that the 01st party, the 02nd party and the land-owner are co-villagers. The land-owner had negotiated for the sale of the said land with the 01st party, he took an advance from him and delivered possession over the said piece of land to the 01st party and left his house. After the passage of 20 years-long periods, the landowner came and executed a registered sale deed in favour of the 02nd party and left his house permanently.

Now the dispute was that the 02nd party is the title-holder of the aforesaid land and the 01st party has been coming  possession over the said land. The 01st party approached to trust for legal remedy.

The Trust asked a question from him about the possibility of the compromise. The first party told that he had paid advance money for the aforesaid land and he has been coming in peaceful possession over the land for more than 20 years.

The Trust observed that if the 02nd party agreed to return advance money to the 01st party and the 01st party agreed to deliver possession over the aforesaid land to the 02nd party, the dispute between the parties may be solved.

After counselling between the parties, the 02nd party agreed to pay the advance money as given by the 01st party to the original land-lord and the 01st party agreed to deliver possession over the said land to the 02nd party.

Accordingly, the dispute between the parties is settled outside the court. With the the effort of the trust, the court was saved from spending precious time in deciding a contested case. The litigation between the two has now come to a full-stop.

S/d
Dilip Kumar
(Secretary)

 

 

Adv. Dilip Kumar

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
Previous Post

Full Stop No. 16/2019 (Criminal Dispute)

Next Post

Full Stop No. 18/2019 (Pre-Litigation Property Dispute)

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Next Post
Full Stop No. 18/2019 (Pre-Litigation Property Dispute)

Full Stop No. 18/2019 (Pre-Litigation Property Dispute)

Discussion about this post

Cases Resolved by the DE

Full-Stop No. 18/2025 (Family-Dispute)

Full-Stop No. 18/2025 (Family-Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
May 6, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full Stop No. 17/2025 (Property – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 17/2025 (Property – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 11, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run and managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full-Stop No. 16/2025 (Family-Dispute)

Full-Stop No. 16/2025 (Family-Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 3, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Load More

Latest Articles on DE

कैमरे के फ़्लैश में धुंधले होते वैवाहिक संस्कार।

कैमरे के फ़्लैश में धुंधले होते वैवाहिक संस्कार।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 21, 2025
0

"कैमरे के फ़्लैश में धुंधले होते वैवाहिक संस्कार" भारत में...

दाम्पत्य संबंध या तलाक, किधर जा रहे है आप।

दाम्पत्य संबंध या तलाक, किधर जा रहे है आप।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 6, 2025
0

लिषा, एक सुंदर और बुद्धिमान लड़की, का जन्म मुजफ्फरपुर जिले...

“डिस्प्यूट-ईटर: पारिवारिक विवादों में निःशुल्क सहायता की एक नई उम्मीद”

“डिस्प्यूट-ईटर: पारिवारिक विवादों में निःशुल्क सहायता की एक नई उम्मीद”

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
February 23, 2025
0

प्रत्येक रविवार को मैं अपने गाँव छपरा मेघ जाता हूँ,...

Judgement from the Court

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

January 7, 2023
बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

September 19, 2022
नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

November 24, 2021
Load More
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin
© 2019-2022 – Dispute Eater

Run & Managed by – RAM YATAN SHARMA MEMORIAL TRUST®

made with love at Ambit Solutions (7488039982)
WhatsApp chat

Notifications