• Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Search
Close
Home Resolve by DE

Full Stop No. 07/2020 (Criminal Dispute)

Adv. Dilip Kumar by Adv. Dilip Kumar
August 11, 2020
in Resolve by DE
0
Full Stop No. 07/2020 (Criminal Dispute)
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp

 

Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust
A Public Charitable Trust
Muzaffarpur
Full Stop No. 07/2020
(Criminal Dispute)

Court Case Details: –
Name of the Court – Chief Judicial Magistrate
Muzaffarpur
Town PS 54/2020
Name of the Informant
: – Ratan Kumar S/o Late Surendra Choudhary, Balughat, Ward No. 17, Ps- Town Muzaffarpur, District – Muzaffarpur Bihar
Name of the Accused: – Shri Rahul Sinha S/o Shri Deepak Sinha A Resident at Shyam Bandh, Chuna Batti, (Near Dr. Gopal) Kali Mandir, Ps- Heerapur, Asansol West Bengal & Others.

Full-Stop

 15.06.2020: –The case was filed by the Informant against the accused named above and others. The case of the Informant is that he is the proprietor of M/S Jyoti Automobile and the Accused is the sales head of a software developing company namely IT Native India Solution (in short hereafter referred to as the company). The representatives of the company (other co-accused) contacted with the informant and told the informant that if a sum of Rs. 18,00,000.00 was deposited in the account, the company supplied the software parts. The informant deposited Rs. 18,00,000.00 in the account of the company through a bank account in different dates. An agreement was also executed by the company in favour of the informant in said regard. But the company neither supplied software parts not returned said amount on demand of the informant. Ultimately the informant filed this case in which the accused Rahul Sinha was arrested and presently in judicial custody.

On the other hand, the case of the accused is that the no forgery was made on the part of the company, rather the said transaction is a commercial transaction.
The matter came into the cognizance of the Trust through the wife of Rahul Sinha. Being asked about the possibility of the compromise she said affirmatively. Accordingly, the matter is compromised between the parties in the following terms and conditions: –

  1. That the Complainant/Informant has already received Rs. 4,00,000.00 (Four Lacs only) before this case which the complainant hereby acknowledge and there is a liability on the complainant of M/s Mamata Enterprises and Dilip Jee amounting to Rupees 2,50,000/- (two lacs fifty thousand) and 1,50,000/- (One lacs fifty thousand) respectively which the accused hereby admits that the said liabilities will be borne by the accused and the Complainant/Informant shall have no concerned with the said liabilities.
  2. That the Informant received Bank Draft of Rs. 3,00,000.00 (Three lakh) issued by ICICI Bank vide draft No. 512424 dated 12.06.2020 amounting Rs. 2,00,000.00 (Two Lakhs) and draft No. 512426 dated 12.06.2020. Rs. 1,00,000.00 (One Lakh) in the name of Jyoti Automobiles.
  3. That for payment of security the Accused handed over two Post Dated Cheques to the Informant of amounting Rs. 5,50,000.00 each (cheque no. 000014 & 000015) of ICICI Bank dated 12.2020 & 14.06.2021.
  4. That, since the agreed amount would not satisfy the case, will proceed however within the fixed period of liquidating the cheque amount the complainant will not take any coercive action in this case.
  5. That the father of the accused namely Deepak Sinha has also filed a criminal case on the Complainant bearing Case No. Hirapur Asansol PS Case no. 40/20 u/s 420,406,504,120B dated 7/02/2020 which the accused in pursuance of this compromise accept that he shall not proceed with the aforesaid and shall withdraw the same unconditionally. It is also agreed that the Informant of Hirapur PS Case No. 40/2020 shall do all necessary steps (including Bail) on his own cost to withdraw the said case. The copy of the compromise must be communicated to the Hirapur Police Station before 25.06.2020. In this way, the litigation between them has now come to a full-stop.

S/d
Dilip Kumar
(Secretory)

Adv. Dilip Kumar

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
Previous Post

वसीयत और उससे संबंधित कानून एक नजर में।

Next Post

अग्रिम जमानत आवेदन उच्च न्यायालय में लंबित रहने को आधार बनाकर नियमित जमानत आवेदन पर सुनवाई न करना अनुचित है, वह अवमानना का मामला बन सकता है- PHC

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Adv. Dilip Kumar

Next Post
बिना मांगे स्वतः प्रदान करना गलत: – पटना उच्च न्यायालय।

अग्रिम जमानत आवेदन उच्च न्यायालय में लंबित रहने को आधार बनाकर नियमित जमानत आवेदन पर सुनवाई न करना अनुचित है, वह अवमानना का मामला बन सकता है- PHC

Discussion about this post

Cases Resolved by the DE

Full-Stop No. 18/2025 (Family-Dispute)

Full-Stop No. 18/2025 (Family-Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
May 6, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full Stop No. 17/2025 (Property – Dispute)

Full Stop No. 17/2025 (Property – Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 11, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run and managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Full-Stop No. 16/2025 (Family-Dispute)

Full-Stop No. 16/2025 (Family-Dispute)

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 3, 2025
0

Dispute-Eater Run & managed by Ram Yatan Sharma Memorial Trust...

Load More

Latest Articles on DE

“बेटी से बहू तक की यात्रा”

“बेटी से बहू तक की यात्रा”

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
May 24, 2025
0

शादी के कुछ ही दोनों बाद विवाद हो गया। कारण...

कैमरे के फ़्लैश में धुंधले होते वैवाहिक संस्कार।

कैमरे के फ़्लैश में धुंधले होते वैवाहिक संस्कार।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 21, 2025
0

"कैमरे के फ़्लैश में धुंधले होते वैवाहिक संस्कार" भारत में...

दाम्पत्य संबंध या तलाक, किधर जा रहे है आप।

दाम्पत्य संबंध या तलाक, किधर जा रहे है आप।

by Adv. Dilip Kumar
April 6, 2025
0

लिषा, एक सुंदर और बुद्धिमान लड़की, का जन्म मुजफ्फरपुर जिले...

Judgement from the Court

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

संयुक्त वसीयत की स्थिति में वसीयत का प्रावधान केवल मृतक वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति तक ही सीमित होगा जीवित वसीयतकर्ता की संपत्ति पर प्रभावी नहीं होगा-  केरल उच्च न्यायालय।

January 7, 2023
बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

बहू को है सास-ससुर के घर में रहने का अधिकार – सुप्रीम कोर्ट का ऐतिहासिक फैसला,  

September 19, 2022
नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

नोटरी विवाह/तलाक दस्तावेजों को निष्पादित करने के लिए अधिकृत नहीं हैं: – MP HC

November 24, 2021
Load More
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Aim
  • Team
  • Photos
  • We Contribute
  • Online Appointment
  • Donate Us
  • FAQs
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin
© 2019-2022 – Dispute Eater

Run & Managed by – RAM YATAN SHARMA MEMORIAL TRUST®

made with love at Ambit Solutions (7488039982)
WhatsApp chat

Notifications